Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Bra Boysblood is thicker then water - 777 Words

A documentary demonstrates an interpretation of the truth by attempting to persuade an audience to side with the makers to endorse their interpretations of issues and events. In the instance Bra boys; Blood is thicker then water, directed by Sunny Abberton, the Bra Boys gang is viewed as a imitation of a prodigious brotherhood gang of surfers that are victims from occurrences and backgrounds opposed to a gang that dispute with the law by an act of violence. The Bra Boys have interpreted issues and events by emphasizing the importance of family, belonging, brotherhood and multiculturalism. The use of presenting constructed footage and personal interviews endorses viewers to see the Bra Boys from a positive light, boys who are role models to†¦show more content†¦This action has been preformed to convince the audience that the bra boys accept multiculturalism. The constructed footage helps viewers realize that documentaries are highly constructed texts, however reinforces they are proud to be Ausies by acknowledging their heritage and traditions of immigrants making Australia fare home. This challenges societies view on multiculturalism due to the fact bra boys are an exclusive gang and would not accept everyone into their brotherhood. To conclude, Bra Boys are viewed as an imitation of a prodigious brotherhood gang of surfers that are victims from occurrences and backgrounds rather then a gang that dispute with the law by an act of violence. Bra Boys are presented with a positive light who are role models built on honesty, trust, loyalty and mate ship who emphasize the importance of family and multiculturalism. The documentary is an interpretation of the truth, biased so as to challenge societies dominant ways of thinking; therefore it cannot beShow MoreRelatedA Critique of the Surfer Dude Culture in Endless Summer562 Words   |  2 Pagesmanifestations of surfer dude culture, there is also a very real and dangerous side to it outside of the water. On shores around the world, there exist surfer gangs. These gangs surf and occupy a specific area of the beach where they live. They often engage or threaten violence to gangs from other areas and even tourists when in their territory. There are documentary films such as Bra Boys: Blood is Thicker than Water that account for surf gangs and the magnitude of their turf wars. There is definitely aRead MoreAustralian Films - Screening Responces3687 Words   |  15 Pagesman’s country, where people stereotypically live a Crocodile Dundee life. Whatever multiculturalism is presented in Australian media is overlooked due to strong Australian stereotypes. Though, recent TV shows, such as Summer Heights High and Angry Boys, have, to an extent, exposed Australian societies to ethnicities and culture. Temple of Dreams  (2007) was produced during the times of the Crunalla riots, articulating young Australian Muslims to acknowledge and address the violence and issues evidentRead MoreNewborn Care7523 Words   |  31 Pagesfirst full year of life. You can accept my recommendation with complete confidence. Contents [pic] ⠝â€" Getting Started ⠝â€" Feeding Your Newborn No Cow’s Milk Feeding Times How Much Is Enough? Drinking Water Burping Sharing Feeding Times ⠝â€" Breastfeeding Eat a Balanced Diet Beware of Medications When You Need to Supplement ⠝â€" Infant Formula Wash and Sterilize Use the Proper Nipple Hole Size GetRead MoreStrategy Safari by Mintzberg71628 Words   |  287 Pagesis to chart the course of an organization in order for it to sail cohesively through its environment. Disadvantage: Strategic direction can also serve as a set of blinders to hide potential dangers. Setting out on a predetermined course in unknown waters is the perfect way to sail into an iceberg. While direction is important, sometimes it is better to move slowly, a little bit at a time, looking carefully but not too far ahead, as well as to each side, so that behavior can be shifted at a moment

Monday, December 9, 2019

Class Conflict in the Great Gatsby free essay sample

The Great Gatsby, is the theme of society and class. Three separate social classes are portrayed in the novel: â€Å"old money,† â€Å"new money,† and the lowest class known as â€Å"no money. † The â€Å"old money† class refers to those who come from families that have fortunes. â€Å"New money† families are those who made their money in the Roaring Twenties and often lavishly display their wealth. In the novel, the growing tension between the â€Å"old† and the â€Å"new† money classes are shown through Gatsby and Tom’s struggle over Daisy. The novel’s narrator, Nick Carraway, begins the novel by sharing advice his father gave him when he was younger: do not criticize others because â€Å"all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that [he has] had† (1). Nick’s father informs his son that his advantage over most people in the world is that he comes the â€Å"old money† class. We will write a custom essay sample on Class Conflict in the Great Gatsby or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Unlike the people around him, Nick casts himself as a nonjudgmental character with regard to social class, which is opposed to others during this time period. In this period, the Roaring Twenties, members of â€Å"new money† enjoyed the pleasures of easy money, ample drinking, and sumptuous parties; and while his fellows pranced from party to party every night, he would not become involved in their inane manners. Nick â€Å"lived at West Egg – well, the less fashionable of the two† (5) which is located directly across the bay from East Egg. Throughout the novel, Nick observes how greatly the two communities differ. Their location, across the water from one another, symbolically shows the class rivalry because they literally opposed each other. West Egg is where the â€Å"new money† echelon lives, and East Egg does not accept them because they have neither cultural refinement nor social connections. Nick’s character is odd because he spans both worlds; he comes from â€Å"old money† but rents a house in West Egg, where the â€Å"new money† class resides. Within the novel, Fitzgerald constantly criticizes those with â€Å"new money† values by expressing their values as thoughtless and ignorant. Daisy, who both Gatsby and Tom are drawn by, has a difficulty in understanding the structure of West Egg because she normally does whatever society expects from her – she is not used to the carelessness of the â€Å"new money† class: Who is this Gatsby anyhow? demanded Tom suddenly. Some big bootlegger? Where’d you hear that? I inquired. I didn’t hear it. I imagined it. A lot of these newly rich people are just big bootleggers, you know. Not Gatsby, I said shortly. He was silent for a moment. The pebbles of the drive crunched under his feet. Well, he certainly must have strained himself to get this menagerie together. A breeze stirred the gray haze of Daisy’s fur collar. At least they’re more interesting than the people we know, she said with an effort. (6. 98-105) By juxtaposing Gatsby and Daisy, Fitzgerald distinctly reveals the idiocy of the â€Å"new money† class. Daisy comes from an environment with true values and stiff behavior, and when placed in West Egg she finds herself unable to live with such negligence. The theme of this novel, the hollowness of the upper class, is similarly portrayed at the very end of the novel after the death of Gatsby. The day before Gatsby’s funeral, Nick goes around in an effort to assemble more people to attend the services. He goes to New York to try to get Meyer Wolfsheim, a friend of Gatsby, to attend the ceremony. Wolfsheim reflects on his friendship with Gatsby, and he claims that he â€Å"raised him up out of nothing. † But he tells Nick that he can’t go because he can’t get mixed up† with dead men (171). Wolfsheim is unscrupulous, selfish, and heartless, he exhibits the worst facet of â€Å"new money†. He claims that he raised Gatsby from the â€Å"gutters† and in doing so he insinuates that money is everything. â€Å"Who is rich? He who is happy with his lot† (Pirkei Avot 4:1). As portrayed through this novel, money corrupts both society and class. In the end, the only people that bear happiness are those who are not deluded by riches. Ariel Haar Mrs. Saddler English 11 November 16, 2011 The Unscrupulousness of The Roaring Twenties In his novel, The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald uses Jay Gatsby’s parties to present a satirical portrait of the Roaring Twenties. The U. S. faced an enormous economic expansion after World War I, which turned the 1920s into a time of easy money, ample drinking, and sumptuous parties. During this time period people were filled with optimism towards the future, but through this novel, Fitzgerald conveys a darker side of this time period. His portrait of the Roaring Twenties focuses on the hypocrisy and recklessness of the people during that time. While attending a party at Gatsby’s house, Nick observes the luxuriousness of the party. On the outside, the parties seem to hold the fulfillment of the American Dream, but Fitzgerald harshly shows that this is not the case. At the conclusion of the party that night, Nick says goodbye to Gatsby and leaves. On his way back home he sees that Owl Eyes, a guest at Gatsby’s party, has driven his car into a ditch, which to Nick â€Å"the fact [is] infinitely astonishing† (53). Symbolically, this crash represents the reckless disregard of society during this time period. Fitzgerald paints this scene after the party at Gatsby’s house to show that the recklessness of the parties lives on even after the matter. After the party environment dies down, Nick describes his life to the reader, presenting that he is different than most others by clearly expressing that he does more than just party. In chapter 3, Fitzgerald spends most of the pages on showing the carelessness of people’s actions during the Roaring Twenties. The juxtaposition of Nick’s lifestyle to the party lifestyle clearly emulates his bleak feeling toward the 1920s. Yet Fitzgerald’s harshest criticism of this time period does not present itself until the last chapter. Two years subsequent to Gatsby’s death, Nick remembers back to the days shortly after his death, in which he remembers the rumors that spread, and people prowling around his mansion to search for more gossip about him: I remember the rest of that day, and that night and the next day, only as an endless drill of police and photographers and newspaper men in and out of Gatsby’s front door†¦The adventitious authority of [Wilson’s] voice set the key for the newspaper reports next morning. Most of those reports were a nightmare – grotesque, circumstantial, eager, and untrue. When Michaelis’s testimony at the inquest brought to light Wilson’s suspicions of his wife I thought the whole tale would shortly be served up in racy pasquinade – but Catherine, who might have said anything, didn’t say a word. She showed a surprising amount of character about it too – looked at the coroner with determined eyes under that corrected brow of hers, and swore that her sister had never seen Gatsby, that her sister was completely happy with her husband, that her sister had been into no mischief whatever. 163) Similar to Roaring Twenties the reports about Gatsby quickly spread and were filled mostly with lies and deceit. The fact that Gatsby was the same both dead and alive, little more than a rumor, Fitzgerald sardonically portrays the issues within the Roaring Twenties’ â€Å"new money† ideology. The Roaring Twenties was an era of great economic growth; but despite the economies success, â€Å"new money† ideology removed individualism and rationality from society in favor of carelessness.

Monday, December 2, 2019

My Shiny New Shoes free essay sample

Nike dropped â€Å"Rise† on Oct. 27, 2010 and in 90 seconds; the ad manages to touch on LeBron’s decision and the entire negative backlash. The commercial portrays a man simply trying to do what is best for his career and life in general, while being scrutinized by millions of people. He is his own man and does not have to follow the paths dictated by previous greats or what the fans want for him. LeBron James would like us to think that he is simply too confident in his own abilities to care what other people think of him.This is the attitude he carries in the ad as he tries to sell you his new Nike Air Max LeBron VIII shoes. James asks several questions in the new ad, beginning with What should I do? Throughout the commercial, James brings up the variety of different criticisms he took for his decision. The commercial ends with the most significant question: Should I be who you want me to be? The commercial begins with a scene depicting the ESPN Decision Special. We will write a custom essay sample on My Shiny New Shoes or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page James begins his series of questions with, â€Å"What should I do? Should I admit that I have made mistakes? This is clearly an example of the pathos approach. He directly speaks to the audience hearts by mentioning the word mistakes. It is fair to believe that most people have made a mistake in their 2 lives and that James is just like each and every one of us, a human being. Most fans admitted that they were not mad at the decision itself but the way it was made. James wants you to believe that it does not make sense to hate him for merely making a poor lapse in judgment while trying to better his situation. The ad quickly changes its tone as James asks, â€Å"Should I remind you I have done this before?Should I give you a history lesson? † This scene has James in high school staring at all his trophies and accomplishments. This reminds the audience that he may be hated now, but the fact that his praise was earned from his astonishing talent cannot be discounted. He was the number one overall pick of the NBA draft and brought seven amazing years to a franchise that was dead last in the league. This also plays into the next scene. James is in Cleveland driving by the giant WE ARE ALL WITNESSES† banner of him doing the signature powder toss, as it is being torn down. While this is happening he asks, â€Å"Should I tell you how much fun we had? † Once again, this is playing directly into the emotional approach of pathos. A nostalgic feeling sets over the audience as they remember all the great memories he brought to the city of Cleveland, the NBA and the world of sports. This is a great approach to use in this segment because most people’s reactions on the decision were based off emotion. This especially hit home with Clevelanders that watched their home born star rise through AAU, high school and now the professional ranks.All over the nation Cavaliers fan’s hearts sunk to their stomach as the words, â€Å"I will be taking my talents to South, Beach† left the king’s mouth. 3 In the next scene James asks, â€Å"Should I really believe I ruined my legacy†, at an empty podium speaking to an empty room at a mock Hall of Fame induction. â€Å"So this went well,† James says sarcastically as the scene all udes to Jordan’s famous Hall of Fame speech. After Jordan gave his speech, he received some negative feedback. This reminds people that even the almighty Michael Jordan made mistakes or said things out of line, but he believed what he said and backed it up.He did all this despite the supposed damaged brand and former fans swearing they would not support him anymore. Although he did generate a new fan base in Miami, this ad may have proven to persuade some newly born Lebron haters. By taking such a strong stance and fighting back, James opens the door to a new persona. He asks â€Å"Should I accept this role as a villain? † as he is holding a pistol dressed as an old outlaw. This shows James contemplating whether he should try and win the love of the fans back or embrace the hate, once again playing the appeal of pathos. James wants the audience to feel bad for pushing him into the villain role. The Lebron James everyone loved and is used to seeing is gone. The guy who used to smile all the time and celebrate with his teammates is gone. The audience might not want to let that past feeling go and may feel bad for pushing him to the â€Å"dark side. † The problem with this approach is most people understand James put himself into this situation. Nearing the end of the ad James is at the wheel of a bulldozer tearing through a basketball arena.This exemplifies James trying to rebuild his image with this ad and that he really just wants everyone to forget about what happened. Rebuilding his image is not only about people liking him but the benefits of sales and promotions as well. Obviously being liked sold plenty of products but will being the bad guy lure a new fan base? This uses the appeal of pathos 5 and how many people wish they could have the slate cleaned and start fresh. Ethos is applied as well as James establishes an authoritative presence, as well as someone who is worthy of and demands respect.The ad ends with LeBron asking, â€Å"Should I be who you want me to be? †, while pictures flash of scenes in the commercial and James laying the ball up. This is one final attempt to point out how unfair demands of the fans are. With all this in mind, there lays the question, Should he be who you think he should be? Or more importantly, should we buy his shoes. The slogan â€Å"Just do it† and the Nike swoosh fade in and out reminding you the same company that endorses the great Michael Jordan is doing the same with Lebron. Nikes credibility solidifies this persuasive ad urging you to just do it, to just buy the shoes.